Pure Energy Systems is reporting that third party test results verifying Andrea Rossi’s claims that his ecat low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) device has generated temperatures of 1200 degrees Celsius exist. The results apparently verify claims leaked earlier this month by Domenico Fioravanti a colonel and military engineer who was working with Rossi. Fiorvanti was apparently present at the test in July 16.
Andrea Rossi testing an ecat core date unknown
If these claims are true it means that Rossi’s ecat is capable are generating temperatures hot enough to create steam. It would also mean that Rossi has a stable LENR device capable of generating high temperatures. That means it could be used for a wide variety of industrial and other purposes such as waste disposal.
The problem is that Pure Energy Systems and Rossi are refusing to reveal the test results or the third party’s identity to the public. Therefore these reports are merely hearsay. There is also a report that the results will be released by University of Bologna perhaps as early as October.
Sergio Focardi Watches Rossi testing an earlier version of ecat
That would seem to indicate that Sergio Focardi and Giuseppe Levi both of whom are retired from the University of Bologna are conducting the tests. Since Rossi apparently now lives and works in Miami Beach and the ecat testing is being done in Bologna this would seem to indicate that somebody else perhaps Focardi is running the show there.
There is also a possibility that Rossi will reveal the results or at least some data from them at his Energy Change with E-cat Technology event for licensees in Zurich, Switzerland on September 8 and 9.
What appears to be the patent for Francesco Celani’s nickel hydrogen LENR device has been posted online. The patent describes the design of his device and some of its operations. The patent can be viewed at this website and downloaded as a PDF.
Another LENR pioneer Edmond Storms has explained his theory for LENR or the nuclear active environment theory. The explanation has been placed on youtube and I’ve posted it above for you to take a look at. I haven’t had a chance to watch it yet because of my workload.
Why there is not comments about all these experiments on TV and radio channels in France and probably in Europe, neither in scientifics magazines ?
Is all that quite serious or the biggest hoax ever built ?
Nevertheless interested in your regular posts
That’s hard to say largely because it’s not sexy or exciting. My guess is the media will come around when somebody like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett starts putting money into it. As for scientific magazines they only publish articles about science that won’t offend the establishment. When the establishment buys into LENR it will appear on the cover of all of them.
Thanks for your reply. Just an exception to my comment : 4 pages in the french magazine “Science et Vie” (pp 132-135; march 2012 issue No 1134). This article clearly question about the scientific approach of Rossi and his device.
The facts are blatant, that LENr is real, as NASA GRC says…
as NI says, as SRI says, as Spawar says, as DoD says, as ENEA says, as CEA Grenoble measured and replicated it…
Of course by bad luck, incompetences, lasyness, or fraud, some team failed… but failure, except if there is only failures, are just failures… failure does not cancel any success.
Science magazine was ridiculous in rejecting ENEA report 41 (Deninno)… suprem level of groupthink and stupid hypocritical excuse. hopefull replicated by all magazine around. (note since it is replicated, and peer reviewed, stupidity of peer magazine is a validated fact).
see our open lette with key information and reference
http://lenrnews.eu/?p=764
see also tyler slides
http://www.lenrproof.com/
why the mainstream news does not talk of that …
for the same reason Enron get bankrupt.
the same reason subprime crisis get hidden since 2006 and only mainstream when Lehman Brother get bankrupt.
in the open letter there is reference to the work of benabou who give many examples, and propose a model to explain why GroupThink and collective delusion is rational, especially is hierarchy. Note that science is a hierarchy, and that peer-review magazine a,d funding agency are at the top, since their opinion decide of the individual life or scientists. so scientist have to agree , by groupthink, with those administrative monolith…
Remember the media is a bunch of human beings with limited resources. They also have to report to advertisers etc. So its amazing that they can report as much as they do. I agree. I wonder what other frightening things they aren’t talking about that we should know about.
Good day very cool site!! Man .. Excellent .
. Amazing .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also?
I’m glad to find so many useful info here in the publish, we’d like work out extra strategies in this regard,
thank you for sharing. . . . . .
OK.
Thanks for your reply. Just an exception to my comment : 4 pages in the french magazine “Science et Vie” (pp 132-135; march 2012 issue No 1134). This article clearly question about the scientific approach of Rossi and his device.